Medico-Legal Review
The verification layer between your AI scribe and your signature.
AI scribes generate notes quickly. Rowan independently reviews documentation before it becomes part of the clinical record - checking what scribes are not designed to check, against a framework built from 2,300 Australian and UK tribunal cases.
No payment required.
Australian GPs only in initial cohort.
2,300+
Tribunal cases analysed
TGA Confirmed
Outside medical device regulation
AHPRA-Aligned
Documentation framework
Five-Pillar
Shield Score framework
17 Years
Clinical experience, founded by a GP
AI scribes capture conversations. Complaints are judged on documentation. Those are not the same thing.
AI scribes generate notes. They do not verify them. They can miss clinical reasoning, safety-netting conversations, consent discussions, and documentation gaps - not because they are poorly designed, but because verification is a different task from transcription. The clinician remains responsible for what gets signed.
Rowan reviews before you sign.
THE PROCESS
Verification in the workflow, not after the fact.
01
Your scribe generates the note.
Rowan works alongside any AI scribe — Heidi, Dragon, T-Pro, Lyrebird, or dictation-based tools. No change to your current setup.
02
Rowan reviews it.
The note is assessed against the five-pillar Shield Score
03
You see what matters.
Rowan surfaces specific documentation concerns. You review, decide, and sign with confidence.
The Shield Score is Rowan's structured verification framework. Each consultation note is assessed across five dimensions of documentation quality - identifying what needs attention before you sign, not after a complaint arrives.
01
Built from regulatory standards
The framework is grounded in primary regulatory and professional guidance across four common law jurisdictions. Where independent regulators converge on the same obligations, that convergence defines the standard.
02
Validated against real tribunal outcomes
The weightings within the framework are informed by how documentation failures have featured in real cases - their frequency, severity, and role in adverse findings.
03
Calibrated beyond the tribunal record
Most medico-legal matters never reach a public hearing. The framework accounts for the broader claims landscape - not only what is decided, but what is settled and why.
04
Tested across clinical scenarios
Framework outputs were iteratively reviewed against expert medico-legal assessment across a wide range of documentation quality and presentation types to ensure consistency and clinical relevance.
The Shield Score is not a pass/fail. It is a clinical prompt - the same kind of review a senior GP partner would conduct before signing off a complex note.
WHO BUILT THIS
Dr Andrew Wall is a Scottish-trained GP practising in Queensland, Australia. He holds MBChB, MRCGP, and FRACGP, and has 17 years of clinical experience across UK and Australian general practice.
Before moving to Australia, he was a GP partner in one of the UK's largest primary care networks - 100,000 patients across 12 sites. Handling three to four complaints per week, supporting colleagues through tribunal processes, and reviewing documentation in high-stakes situations became part of the role.
Rowan was built from that experience - and from a systematic analysis of how tribunal decisions are actually made. The framework is not derived from guidelines alone. It is derived from outcomes.
This is the tool he needed when AI scribes became part of his own practice.
The initial cohort is small. It is designed for GPs who want to use AI scribes with confidence - and who understand why documentation quality is a clinical issue, not an administrative one.
No payment required. No obligation. You will receive a personal response.
© 2026 Rowan Tree Health Pty Ltd. Rowan is not a medical device. It does not provide clinical advice.